humanoidmetric.com
Independent humanoid-robot metrics · Xodexa
HMX v2.0.0
Categories › Fixed Manipulators & Cobots

Fixed Manipulators & Cobots

1 robot · scored by MMX

Stationary industrial arms and collaborative robots, mounted to a floor, bench or gantry.

1
robots scored
1
companies
1
shipping / limited
1
countries

Robot Arms & Cobots in 2026: the market at a glance

One robot arm or cobot is tracked so far: M-2000iA/2300 by FANUC, scored 73.6 on the Manipulator Metric (MMX).

How this category is scored

The Manipulator Metric (MMX), version 0.2.0. Pillars are weighted for what actually matters to this class, and normalised against fixed manipulators & cobots-specific reference scales.

Autonomy & Intelligence 15%
Manipulation & Dexterity 38%
Hardware & Engineering 22%
Commercial Readiness & Deployment 25%

Not applicable to this category: Mobility & Locomotion, Ecosystem & Viability. These pillars are excluded from the index and the remaining weights renormalised — not scored zero.

Full methodology →

Category profile

Form factors
articulated-arm, scara, delta, cartesian-gantry, dual-arm, other
Typical domains
Manufacturing, Logistics & Warehousing, Research & Education, Healthcare
Research cadence
every 90 days
Index
MMX

Every company in this category is re-checked on the cadence above by the research agents, and every proposed change is reviewed before it reaches this page.

The companies building fixed manipulators & cobots robots →

#RobotCompanyStatus AutonomyMMX
1 M-2000iA/2300 FANUC commercial supervised-autonomy 73.6

Why the MMX weighs what it weighs

The published reasoning behind every pillar weight in the Manipulator Metric, version 0.2.0.

  • Manipulation (0.38) — the heaviest single pillar on the platform, because it is the entire product. Led by repeatability, the number buyers select on and the first line of every datasheet in the industry, then payload, reach and articulation.
  • Commercial (0.25) — the most mature market the platform covers. These machines ship in six figures a year, so realised deployment is a much stronger signal here than in a class still proving it works.
  • Hardware (0.22) — joint speed, payload-to-weight, and whether it is safety-rated for collaborative operation. That last one dominates installation cost: a fenceless cell is a different economic proposition.
  • Autonomy (0.15) — weighted lower than anywhere else, and deliberately. Most of this class is programmed, not autonomous, and the ladder rightly places that low; weighting it at humanoid levels would rank the entire established industry beneath a research biped. It is kept because vision-guided, self-calibrating and learned-policy arms are exactly where the class is moving.
  • Mobility (0.00)excluded. The machine is bolted to a floor. Scoring it zero would be a category error, not a measurement.
  • Ecosystem (0.00)excluded. The market leaders are divisions of public industrial conglomerates (FANUC, ABB, Yaskawa, KUKA); a venture funding figure measures nothing about them.

Frequently asked questions

How many robot arms & cobots are there in 2026?

This index tracks 1 robot arm or cobot from 1 company, counting only machines documented by at least two independent sources.

Other categories

Humanoid Quadruped / Legged Mobile Robots & AMRs Aerial / UAV Marine / Underwater Heavy & Off-Road Surgical & Clinical Consumer & Domestic Specialised