humanoidmetric.com
Independent humanoid-robot metrics · Xodexa
HMX v2.0.0
Categories › Marine / Underwater

Marine / Underwater

2 robots · scored by MARMX

Autonomous underwater vehicles, remotely operated vehicles and uncrewed surface vessels.

2
robots scored
1
companies
2
shipping / limited
1
countries

Underwater Robots in 2026: the market at a glance

This category contains 2 ranked underwater robots from 1 companies in 1 countries. The MARMX is a specification score; legacy admission does not establish field-level review or independent task testing.

2 of the 2 records are at commercial or limited-production stage. These recorded maturity claims do not establish paid deployments or operating performance.

How this category is scored

The Marine Metric (MARMX), version 0.2.0. Pillars are weighted for what actually matters to this class, and normalised against marine / underwater-specific reference scales.

Autonomy & Intelligence 25%
Manipulation & Dexterity 8%
Mobility & Locomotion 30%
Hardware & Engineering 25%
Commercial Readiness & Deployment 12%

Not applicable to this category: Ecosystem & Viability. These pillars are excluded from the index and the remaining weights renormalised — not scored zero.

Full methodology →

Category profile

Form factors
auv, rov, usv, glider, other
Typical domains
Energy & Utilities, Inspection & Maintenance, Defence, Research & Education
Research cadence
every 45 days
Index
MARMX

Every company in this category is re-checked on the cadence above by the research agents, and every proposed change is reviewed before it reaches this page.

The companies building marine / underwater robots →

#RobotCompanyStatus AutonomyMARMX
1 Surveyor Saildrone commercial task-autonomous 80.3
2 Voyager Saildrone commercial task-autonomous 57.9

Why the MARMX weighs what it weighs

The published reasoning behind every pillar weight in the Marine Metric, version 0.2.0.

  • Mobility (0.30) — endurance and range, weighted far above speed. Drag rises with the square of velocity underwater, so every extra knot is bought from the endurance the mission actually needs.
  • Hardware (0.25) — led by depth rating, the one hard physical gate in the class: a 300 m vehicle cannot do a 3000 m job at any price, while most other specs are trades rather than walls.
  • Autonomy (0.25) — the sharpest dividing line here. A work-class ROV is teleoperated by definition, flown down an umbilical from a support vessel costing six figures a day. The ladder scoring that at 35 is not a penalty; it is the cost problem the AUV market exists to solve.
  • Commercial (0.12) — deliberately light. Offshore contracts are commercially confidential and rarely announced, so an absent deployment list is usually missing evidence rather than an idle machine.
  • Manipulation (0.08) — for work-class ROVs with hydraulic manipulators. Survey AUVs carry none and are not marked down for it.
  • Ecosystem (0.00) — excluded. Mostly subsidiaries of offshore-services and defence groups where a funding figure means nothing.

Frequently asked questions

How many underwater robots are there in 2026?

This catalogue ranks 2 records from 1 companies; the count covers the complete category, including later pages.

How many underwater robots are commercially available?

2 records claim commercial or limited-production maturity. Consult their deployment evidence for support and lifecycle details.

Other categories

Humanoid Quadruped / Legged Fixed Manipulators & Cobots Mobile Robots & AMRs Aerial / UAV Heavy & Off-Road Surgical & Clinical Consumer & Domestic Specialised